Friday, October 10, 2014

New Beginnings Take Two - Part II. Genesis 2:16-25

May the mumbling commence!

It’s another time of beginning.  Let’s continue our look at the second account of creation in Genesis chapter two.  Read from Peterson’s The Message:

God commanded the Man, “You can eat from any tree in the garden, except from the Tree-of-Knowledge-of-Good-and-Evil.  Don’t eat from it.  The moment you eat from that tree, you’re dead.”
God said, “It’s not good for the Man to be alone; I’ll make him a helper, a companion.”  So God formed from the dirt of the ground all the animals of the field and all the birds of the air.  He brought them to the Man to see what he would name them.  Whatever the Man called each living creature, that was its name.  The Man named the cattle, named the birds of the air, named the wild animals; but he didn’t find a suitable companion.
God put the Man into a deep sleep.  As he slept he removed one of his ribs and replaced it with flesh.  God then used the rib that he had taken from the Man to make Woman and presented her to the Man.

The Man said,
            “Finally!  Bone of my bone,
                        flesh of my flesh!
            Name her Woman
                        for she was made from Man.”
                        Therefore a man leaves his father and mother and embraces his wife.
                        They become one flesh.
                        The two of them, the Man and his Wife, were naked, 
                                 but they felt no shame. (Genesis 2:16-25)

Now read the same passage from the NIV translation:

And the Lord God commanded the man, "You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die." 
The Lord God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him." 
Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name.  So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds of the air and all the beasts of the field.
But for Adam no suitable helper was found.  So the Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man's ribs and closed up the place with flesh.  Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man. 
The man said,
"This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called 'woman,
'for she was taken out of man." 
For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.  The man and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame.  (Genesis 2:16-25)

There is much agreement between the NIV translation and Peterson’s work.  I pick contention with his use of “can”.  I think a better word would be “may”.  God is giving permission.  The man has permission to eat from any fruit in the garden.  He has the freedom to do so, as the NIV translation underscores.  However the fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (I’m not sure why Peterson did the hyphenated thing!) is not among the permitted fruits.  God knows that man can eat from it… and that consumption causes problems… eventually.  

That eventuality makes me also pick a bone with Peterson’s translation “you’re dead” and opposed to the NIV’s “you will surely die”.  

I like the addition of the concept of companion.  I believe it gets at the heart of what the text is saying about the relationship between man and woman, husband and wife.  

But I do have another bone to pick with Peterson.  I’m not sure about the exasperation that is added to the man’s emphatic “Finally” in his statement about the woman.  And more importantly, I also do not like his “embraces” against the “be united to” of the NIV.  I like the stronger language of permanence in the NIV.


Enough mumbling for now…  

Peace Out  

No comments:

Post a Comment