May the mumbling commence!
God shows love to all.
It’s true. But to us, it seems
that God shows extra special love to the unloved. That’s the case with Leah. She was unloved by Jacob but loved by
God. Read from Peterson’s The Message:
When God
realized that Leah was unloved, he opened her
womb. But Rachel was barren. Leah became pregnant and had a son. She named him Reuben (Look-It’s-a-Boy!). “This
is a sign,” she said, “that God
has seen my misery; and
a sign that now my husband will love me.”
She became pregnant again and
had another son. “God heard,” she said, “that I was unloved and so he gave
me this son also.” She named this one Simeon (God-Heard). She became pregnant yet again
– another son. She said, “Now
maybe my husband
will connect
with me – I’ve given him three sons!” That’s why she
named him Levi (Connect). She became pregnant a
final time and had a fourth son. She said, “This time I’ll praise God.” So she named him
Judah (Praise-
God). Then she stopped having children. (Genesis
29:31-35)
Now read the same passage from the NIV translation:
When the Lord saw that Leah was
not loved, he opened
her womb, but Rachel was barren. Leah
became pregnant and gave birth to a son. She named him Reuben, for she said, "It is because the Lord
has seen my misery. Surely
my husband will love me now."
She conceived again, and when she gave
birth to a son she said, "Because the Lord
heard that I am
not loved, he gave me this one too." So she
named him Simeon.
Again she conceived, and when she gave
birth to a son she said, "Now at last my husband will become attached to me, because I have borne him three sons." So
he was named Levi.
She conceived again, and when she
gave birth to a son she said, "This time I will praise the Lord." So she named him Judah. Then
she stopped having children. (Genesis 29:31-35)
God loves people who find love hard to find… even those
people who are hard to love. There are
some differences between the NIV and Peterson’s work. Most changes are of little consequence to the
heart and soul of the passage.
I take issue with only two cases. First, I do not like the change from the NIV’s
“become attached to” and Peterson’s “connect with”. People can “connect with” one another and not
experience love. The act of sex is not
an act of love necessarily.
To “become attached to” has a whole other level of
meaning. It means I cannot live without
you. It’s how I feel about my wife. I think that’s what Leah desired more than
all her children. It’s something she never
received from Jacob.
The second issue I have with Peterson’s work in this
passage is that he talks of Leah becoming pregnant a final time. Though she stopped for the time being, as
both works note at the end, she most definitely did not get pregnant for the
final time. We will see that in the
coming days. So, why add this statement
in the text? There’s no reason for it.
And did you notice how long it took Leah to praise the
Lord? Not one time… not two times… not
three times (even the third time was not the charm)… but it took four times
before Leah praise the Lord. The first
three times she was looking desperately for love from her husband Jacob.
Only on the fourth birth did she realize the importance
of God loving her. I think that’s why
the Lord stopped giving her sons for a time.
She finally learned the heart lesson God was trying to teach her. God loves you. That’s all that matters.
It was that son, Judah, who would be the ancestor of
Jesus. How’s that for loving Leah! It was her son that would become the ancestor
of Jesus, the Messiah – not a son of Rachel.
Do you feel unloved?
God sends you a message, too. God
loves you. That’s all that matters.
Enough mumbling for now…
Peace Out
No comments:
Post a Comment